The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. A M262 is a friendly camera. The camera is nearly forgotten in the Leica world. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. I currently own a 262. It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. You have to ask yourself, . I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . Id probably buy a new car. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. If you want video and live view, get the 240. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? In a world where newer camera models are expected to have more features not less, the Leica M262 doesnt really fit into the normal upgrade path camera manufacturers offer. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Yes, the image quality of the Leica M (type 240) is a step down from the Leica M9. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. There is a slight sense that this camera isnt a major model it feels a tiny bit like theres a few too many buttons, and that the body of the camera is a little hollow, but in practice these things go unnoticed. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. Paste as plain text instead, This happens with the M240 from time to time. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). Find out more about 35mmc here. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. - and the M240 in color. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. Great article as always! To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Help us by suggesting a value. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! Nice write-up. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . I was wrong! Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. Equally, if I dont find anything particularly bad to say, thats got to be a good thing too, but it doesnt really help in the process of finding things to say. The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression artifacts. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Continue with Recommended Cookies. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. . An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. BudfoxJuly 7, 2016 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). M262 can be more pleasing in use as lighter with longer lasting battery and a bit quieter than M240. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Leica M Typ 240. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. Functionalism be damned. Turns out that was bollocks too! Thank you for it. The sensor is not the same, by the way. The M9 and CCD sensor. The M240 feels, well, fuller. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. Your link has been automatically embedded. High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. Be the first. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . So I am very glad I got the 240 version. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. I use along the two M240/262/etc. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! In fact, there was a time when I swore I didnt need anything more. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! Source: DxOMark. I wish I did. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. To me this seems like a hassle. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. . A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. I was once very happy with my M9. I need a new 50mm lens. : very useful. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. When moving from M9 to M262 Id not put too much thought into how much difference this would make to me, in practice though, this small change in interface makes a big difference to how the camera feels. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. This really piqued my interest. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. I have not seen that anywhere in the promotional material. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. Quality over quantity. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. Clear editor. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. Using the right SD card is key here. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Source: DxOMark. You cannot paste images directly. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter.